Chat
Micro Mart Forum
Home       Members    Calendar    Who's On
Welcome Guest ( Login | Register )
        


«««123

Mac has only 7 out of 230,000 viruses Expand / Collapse
Author
Message
Posted 04/09/2008 20:38:40
186

186186186186186

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 15/11/2008 17:33:19
Posts: 155, Visits: 655
in terms of coding for a mac, the setup is similar to coding in Linux or Windows environment only the API's are completely different, and it too install applications or run certain applications as root you need to log in as administrator.

The idea that people dont write virus's for Mac because there arent enough Mac users out there I find very interesting. Considering nearly all media departments of any organisation, be it a corporation, charity or state run public service depend entirely on macs for web development, media editting etc (i fully aknowledge some dont) AND given the fact that 60-70% of web servers on the planet run FreeBSD (OSX's inards) you'd think that they'd be targetted somewhat more frequently than Windows users, but for some reason this isn't the case, or perhaps its just harder to write malicious software for OSX. I think one of Apples biggest threats right now is phishing scams asking for users MobileMe details.



iMac 24" 2.4GHZ Core 2 Duo - 2GB RAM ATI Radeon HD2600 - OSX 10.5.5
MacBook Pro 17" 2.4GHZ Core 2 Duo - 4GB RAM Nvidia GeForce 8600 GT - OSX 10.5.5
MacMini / 20" Apple Display - 1.6GHZ Core Duo - 1GB RAM Intel GMA OSX 10.5.5 Server
iPhone 3G (02 - UK) 2.1.0 FirmWare
Post #309412
Posted 04/09/2008 22:57:41


486

486486486486486

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 08:47:25
Posts: 1,053, Visits: 1,085
slightly of topic... something made me laugh a few weeks ago.

Im a graphic designer, work with 2macs.

browsing online the other week and i had a popup! my pc was infected, i needed to download XP Antivirus 2008!!! wow.... got me worried lol thought someone had transfered the insides of my mac with a pc.

hopefully not many mac users have been fooled by this, ifso then id love to know how they get the .exe file to wok on there macs.

That XP Antivirus 2008 is a right pain in the a$$ though, mate of mine had it on his laptop, i tired to tell him wat to do but the fool took it to pc world who then charged him £90 to remove it !!! ..... im not saying a word!

[font=Comic Sans MS]E6300/Gigabyte 965P DS3 rev 3.3@ 3.34Gz • 4GB Black Dragon PC 6400 • 320GB & 80GB HDs • Floppy with 7-1 Card Reader • 530 Hyper. PSU • Lightscribe 18x DVD RW x 2 • ATI 3850 • Vista Home Prem. • Samsung 19" TFT[/font]
Post #309436
Posted 05/09/2008 11:11:20


Pentium

PentiumPentiumPentiumPentiumPentium

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 16:58:03
Posts: 5,534, Visits: 29,218
SirTom909 (04/09/2008)
in terms of coding for a mac, the setup is similar to coding in Linux or Windows environment only the API's are completely different, and it too install applications or run certain applications as root you need to log in as administrator.

The idea that people dont write virus's for Mac because there arent enough Mac users out there I find very interesting. Considering nearly all media departments of any organisation, be it a corporation, charity or state run public service depend entirely on macs for web development, media editting etc (i fully aknowledge some dont) AND given the fact that 60-70% of web servers on the planet run FreeBSD (OSX's inards) you'd think that they'd be targetted somewhat more frequently than Windows users, but for some reason this isn't the case, or perhaps its just harder to write malicious software for OSX. I think one of Apples biggest threats right now is phishing scams asking for users MobileMe details.

But.. those aren't really the targets of the majority of Virus writers. Those sorts of machines (uses) are probably more the target of organised crime and straight outright targetted cracking attempts (admittedly maybe using the same exploits a virus might).

Virus' are really a home-user targetted (or rather mass user targetted) thing right?

Cheers,
Tom

My Crime is that of curiosity, my crime is that of outsmarting you




Post #309474
Posted 05/09/2008 20:08:27
386

386386386386386

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 11:35:47
Posts: 583, Visits: 1,435
The attack on Redhat suggests that Servers may be next on the list. I would bet that BSD are/have avidly read everything they can on the Redhat attack and are looking for ways of strengthening their own Update security.

I know nothing about how the Redhat attack was executed, but I would be looking at internal Redhat security with a very jaundiced eye. It is a lot cheaper to suborn employee(s) than to write innovative attack code!

However, I'd agree that the end target even in this case will most probably have been end users (for bot control).
Post #309561
Posted 16/09/2008 09:06:36


Pentium

PentiumPentiumPentiumPentiumPentium

Group: Moderators
Last Login: Yesterday @ 22:02:05
Posts: 3,182, Visits: 3,535
Hi All

The write up on Apple in this weeks MM, states that one of the decisions made by Steve Jobs was to base OS x on Unix, so that is where the fundamental immunity to virus attack on Macs probably originates from.

Its the base security model.

Mad Malc


Post #311345
Posted 16/09/2008 16:24:09


Santa Pig

Santa PigSanta PigSanta PigSanta PigSanta Pig

Group: Moderators
Last Login: Today @ 15:50:27
Posts: 10,198, Visits: 11,205
Also web servers tend to be behind decent corporate protection, like industrial strength firewalls vs windows home pcs sometimes behind bugger all.

Getting to the webserver to make an attack will be a lot more difficult before you start.
Plus a web server's not clicking "yes" to email attachments...

The security model gets a lot easy when there's no-one between the seat and screen

Dave R

Animations - lights
XP Pro + various VMs: Q6600 @ stock, Asus V3-P5G33, 2GB DDR2 800, 7600GT
XP Pro: E1200 @2.4Ghz, GA-G33M-DS2R/S2, 2GB DDR2 800, 3450 on HDMI
Mandriva S 2008: SOA Athlon 2200, 1GB DDR, 9550
Windows Home Server: S3000, ASUS V2-M2V890, 512mb DDR2 667, 1TB
4GB USB Pendrive: Mandriva 2009 - my portable PC

Post #311399
Posted 01/10/2008 20:41:36


186

186186186186186

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 12/12/2008 19:25:45
Posts: 125, Visits: 321
"My [simple] conclusion is that Macs are largely immune to viruses because there are so many PCs and not because Macs are better. "

What a great conclusion! Likewise I believe that I am imune to being shot on the basis that so many other people have been shot!

I love this kind of logic

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2Ghz MacBook, 2Gb RAM, OS X 10.5.2
Fave software : , ,
Post #314360
Posted 02/10/2008 09:07:25
386

386386386386386

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 04/01/2009 23:49:36
Posts: 667, Visits: 1,715
Pixel Kid (01/10/2008)


What a great conclusion! Likewise I believe that I am imune to being shot on the basis that so many other people have been shot!


Pixel Kid, that does not work. You are the same model and have the same OS as all those other people that have been shot.
How is the new store and job coming on? I may be in with a broken wireless mouse soon, if they can be repaired.
Post #314429
Posted 02/10/2008 10:23:17