|
|
|
186
 
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 22/02/2007 10:39:35
Posts: 62,
Visits: 3
|
|
Yes Apple have done it again...
The machine is tiny and can store 1000 songs ... and its about 5mm wide
The joys of technology...
Who knows one day I might be able to afford one..
Oh Globbits!!!
|
|
|
|
|
%20(WinCE)%20(Custom).GIF)
186
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 09/02/2008 22:55:46
Posts: 174,
Visits: 32
|
|
IMHO, I don't think this was the best decision Apple could make really, they've replaced the iPod Mini with a device which has neither the same purpose, really, nor the same features. They have replaced this device, whihc was HDD based - and thus of a relatively large capacity, with a PSS device, which is more expensive, smaller - both in size and capacity - and is completely jog proof. TBH, I wouldn't want to pay extra money for less space, as far as I'm concerned it would be like MS charging me the same for XPH as Pro. I think that this product could have been released as a separate range, or an extension to the Shuffle range - I would have been much more likely to choose a mini for my forthcoming new MP3 player than a nano, simply because I want the capacity. It's easy to forget here, but the problem with Apple portable audio devices is that they are over priced and underspecced, there are many superior products (coming with exotic accessories - like screens) are available for much more competitive prices. That's my £0.02, Chris
Toshiba Portege M200 / 12.1in / P-M 755 / 512 / 60 / FX5200go 32MB / XP-Tablet Celeron D 320 (2.66GHz) / 1280 / 6GB RAID / 120GB & 40GB / Matrox Dual Head GFx / DVD / CDRW
|
|
|
|
|
186
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 06/11/2006 23:23:45
Posts: 95,
Visits: 4
|
|
Yeah they are over priced and under spec, but god you have to love them the coolest thing ever.
They wil go well with your Motorola Razor, your Casio Exslim and now your Apple Nano.
Correct me if i am wrong but all the above where bigger they made them smaller and the sales went through the roof.
|
|
|
|
|
186
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 28/09/2005 17:02:00
Posts: 4,
Visits: 1
|
|
| *POST REMOVED* Please do NOT post links to these 'supposed' free items on this forum. Thanks, Phil
|
|
|
|
|
186
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 06/11/2006 23:23:45
Posts: 95,
Visits: 4
|
|
Nice try lincsmatt but do not think I will be doing the referal on your behalf. Only 2 Posts on the Forum and both are for the same thing. Oh and just for interest why not send us the link you seen for the BBC bet you cant..
|
|
|
|
|
286
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 04/12/2008 17:35:20
Posts: 415,
Visits: 1,554
|
|
Apparently the Apple forums are choked with people who've bought the Nano and have discovered that the display is about as resistant to scratching as butter.
Yes...The joys of technology...
|
|
|
|
|
186
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 28/09/2005 17:02:00
Posts: 4,
Visits: 1
|
|
| grr if you cross post your reply aswell, then how do i know which one is better to just let die. http://news.bbc.co.uk/media/video/40101000/rm/_40101908_ipods_carver22_vi.ram is all i can find now, the transcribed version seems to have dissapeared. yeah it is amazing hiw easily they get scratched, or at least what i've seen from picture, i still want one tho. I have a screen protector for my pda, i'm sure there will be if there arn't already some available for the nano. if not i might just use 2" wide sellotape
|
|
|
|