﻿<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Micro Mart Forum / Linux Mart / Micro Mart Forums  / Great oaks / Latest Posts</title><generator>InstantForum.NET v4.1.4</generator><description>Micro Mart Forum</description><link>http://forum.micromart.co.uk/</link><webMaster>forums@micromart.co.uk</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 00:29:11 GMT</lastBuildDate><ttl>20</ttl><item><title>RE: Great oaks</title><link>http://forum.micromart.co.uk/Topic304337-22-1.aspx</link><description>Same case only translated into English.:)&lt;br&gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7561943.stm</description><pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 07:38:17 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>bigdaddy</dc:creator></item><item><title>Great oaks</title><link>http://forum.micromart.co.uk/Topic304337-22-1.aspx</link><description>Well, the best corporate lawyers have been avoiding this challenge for years, a  [url=http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/08/14/open_source_creative_commons_license_victory/] small court case [/url]could have implications for multinational corporations:&lt;br&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 22:31:07 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>wyliecoyoteuk</dc:creator></item></channel></rss>