﻿<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Micro Mart Forum / PC Talk / Micro Mart Forums  / Intel Atom outclassed by.........                          AMD Athlon64 / Latest Posts</title><generator>InstantForum.NET v4.1.4</generator><description>Micro Mart Forum</description><link>http://forum.micromart.co.uk/</link><webMaster>forums@micromart.co.uk</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 02:48:38 GMT</lastBuildDate><ttl>20</ttl><item><title>RE: Intel Atom outclassed by.........                          AMD Athlon64</title><link>http://forum.micromart.co.uk/Topic305193-23-1.aspx</link><description>LOL. Some hope.</description><pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 23:24:42 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Intel Atom outclassed by.........                          AMD Athlon64</title><link>http://forum.micromart.co.uk/Topic305193-23-1.aspx</link><description>No theres no need to be like that Jason, come on, its gonaa be HPC all the way for AMD.:P:P:P</description><pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 23:09:33 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Teafie</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Intel Atom outclassed by.........                          AMD Athlon64</title><link>http://forum.micromart.co.uk/Topic305193-23-1.aspx</link><description>LOL. Some hope.</description><pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 22:04:44 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Intel Atom outclassed by.........                          AMD Athlon64</title><link>http://forum.micromart.co.uk/Topic305193-23-1.aspx</link><description>yeah its a goodly story.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It will be intresting to see how amd's chip set and 45nm cpus perform against the nehalem and Intels supportive chipset..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There could be a suprise coming along..</description><pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 21:51:53 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Teafie</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Intel Atom outclassed by.........                          AMD Athlon64</title><link>http://forum.micromart.co.uk/Topic305193-23-1.aspx</link><description>Intel's chipset is the biggest problem, it's hot, noisy and spartan feature wise.&lt;br&gt;Intel are making the Atom boards cheap enough for the embedded Atom on Mini ITX board to be sold at £50 to us consumers.&lt;br&gt;Biggest omission in that article was the price difference IMO, expected to be around $90 + mobo vs £50 all in.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(Thought the Atom was destined for UMPC's and smart phones anyway?)</description><pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 20:33:15 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Basil</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Intel Atom outclassed by.........                          AMD Athlon64</title><link>http://forum.micromart.co.uk/Topic305193-23-1.aspx</link><description>Problem, though. It costs several more times the money to manufacture than the Atom and is also physically much bigger. AMD hasn't a prayer of making them in volume at a price that will compete with the other CPUs in the market -- not without making a loss, anyway.</description><pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 20:26:30 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Intel Atom outclassed by.........                          AMD Athlon64</title><link>http://forum.micromart.co.uk/Topic305193-23-1.aspx</link><description>Haha, thats epic.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My girlfriend always calls me an Intel fanboy, but that AMD K8 is a clear winner: I'd have one in an instant if I needed a low power/noise/heat/cost PC.</description><pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 20:19:24 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>gunman127</dc:creator></item><item><title>Intel Atom outclassed by.........                          AMD Athlon64</title><link>http://forum.micromart.co.uk/Topic305193-23-1.aspx</link><description>[url]http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/Atom-Athlon-Efficient,review-31253.html[/url]&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hopefully this will give AMD something to trump about.</description><pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 17:49:13 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>DaveHand</dc:creator></item></channel></rss>