InstantForum.NET v4.1.4Micro Mart Forumhttp://forum.micromart.co.uk/forums@micromart.co.ukSat, 22 Nov 2008 00:15:20 GMT20http://forum.micromart.co.uk/Topic283995-61-1.aspxPlease see here: [url]http://forum.micromart.co.uk/Topic283694-23-1.aspx[/url].Fri, 02 May 2008 23:34:12 GMTJasonhttp://forum.micromart.co.uk/Topic283995-61-1.aspxI read the article..and it took me back..just a short time back.Vista was late..the promised land was not<br>on the horizon.The Media pontificated..and made many comments about Vista not having many of the <br>promised bits..where was? etc etc.<br>Microsoft was in turmoil..must get it out..it arrived..less many parts discussed by the media..it was bunged into<br>many as yet unsold PCs..vouchers handed out..to allow upgrades from XP..you name it..they did it.<br>Could it be that Vista was provided to the gullible public as a "finished" product so that deadlines were [nearly] met<br>whilst in secret work carried on [in Bills garage] with Vista????<br>Is Windows 7 really the finished Vista?<br>This seem the only way that a "new" O/S could be presented to the US Gov in such a short period?<br>Or am I too sceptical....?Fri, 02 May 2008 23:19:11 GMTdigger