|
|
|
386
 
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 03/10/2008 22:18:11
Posts: 620,
Visits: 2,353
|
|
According to the benchmarks in issue 991 this integrated chipset can push 94FPS in Quake 4 @ 1024 x 768 all the rest struggle to hit 10
---------------------------
Subnotebook/netbook/ULCPC# Asus Eee PC 701 Black, Intel Mobile, 1GB DDR2, 4GB Solid-State Disk, 4GB SD Card, Xandros
Laptop# AMD Turion64 ML-32, 1GB, ATI radeon xpress 200m, Seagate 100GB ide, XP & PCLinux 2007
Desktop# AMD Athlon X2 BE-2350, 1GB DDR2, Asus M2A-VM/HDMI, WD 250GB sata, XP
Work# Intel Pentium D 915, 1GB DDR2, NVIDIA FX5200,ASRock 4CoreDual-Vsta, Seagate 80GB ide, XP
I love  lamers
|
|
|
|
|
Santa Pig
Group: Moderators
Last Login: Yesterday @ 15:06:57
Posts: 10,078,
Visits: 11,039
|
|
May be they left out a decimal point?
Dave R
XP Pro + various VMs: Q6600 @ stock, Asus V3-P5G33, 2GB DDR2 800, 7600GT
XP Pro: E1200 @2.4Ghz, GA-G33M-DS2R/S2, 2GB DDR2 800, 3450 on HDMI
Mandriva S 2008: SOA Athlon 2200, 1GB DDR, 9550
Windows Home Server: S3000, ASUS V2-M2V890, 512mb DDR2 667, 1TB
4GB USB Pendrive: Mandriva 2009 - my portable PC 
|
|
|
|
|
Pentium
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 23:29:02
Posts: 5,720,
Visits: 5,674
|
|
That's what I assumed, it performed worse in 3D Mark than the X1300 (X3100?) but did miles better in Quake 4.
Might be a small typo
--------------------Signature. Containing hilarious remixes since 2008--------------------
If I'm not posting, I'm questing
|
|
|
|
|
286
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 03/11/2008 23:57:37
Posts: 414,
Visits: 1,551
|
|
| That's a typo...as a video system it's garbage.
|
|
|
|
|
Pentium
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 20:44:35
Posts: 4,739,
Visits: 4,201
|
|
| For sure todays on board gfx are more powerfull than an FX5200. I have to admit thats not bad. well ok its carp. But I can remember when an fx5200 was £80.
 The Lost Artifact is not lost. Why? Because I have it.
|
|
|
|