|
|
|
386
 
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 2 days ago @ 22:42:53
Posts: 633,
Visits: 742
|
|
Should be interesting
Looks like Intel won't ever need worry about buying Nvidia after all...
Q6600 @ 3.6GHz....4GB RAM @ 900MHz 4-4-5-12....9800GTX @ 800/2000/2400MHz....ASUS P5E
500GB Seagate 7200.11 32MB.....X-Fi Fatal1ty Pro.....Jeantech Storm 700W.....Chieftec Matrix
|
|
|
|
|
Octo-core Atom @ 233GHz (ES)
Group: Moderators
Last Login: Today @ 21:59:54
Posts: 10,429,
Visits: 13,692
|
|
This has been on the cards for a couple of years, but it remains to be seen whether it will be a world-beater by the time it actually arrives. GPU power will probably have doubled again by the time Intel get's the flagship model out. Will it be competitive?
Classic PCs
Original IBM PC (4.77MHz 8088, 256KB RAM, monochrome) · Original IBM PC XT (4.77MHz 8088, 512KB, 10MB HDD, monochrome) · Original Compaq Deskpro (7.14MHz 8086, 640KB, 20MB HDD, CGA graphics)
Home Computers
Commodore VIC-20 · C64 original · C64 Terminator edition · C16 · Amiga 500 · Amiga 600 · Amiga 600 HD · Amiga 1200 Acorn Electron · A3010 (Archimedes) · A4000 (Archimedes) Others Sinclair ZX Spectrum 48K · Dragon 32
Consoles
Nintendo Wii · GameCube purple (x 2) · GameCube black · N64 black (x 2) · N64 clear blue · SNES (x 2) · NES (x 2) · DS silver (x 3) · GBA SP silver · GBA purple · GBA clear · Game Boy Color clear · Game Boy Sega Dreamcast x 3 · Saturn · Mega Drive II · Mega Drive · Master System Atari 10-in-1 · Jaguar (x 2) · 7800 · 2600 wood-grain Microsoft Xbox 360 · Xbox Others Mattel Intellivision · MB Vectrex · GoldStar 3DO · Sony PlayStation (original)
|
|
|
|
|
Pentium
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 29/10/2008 21:40:22
Posts: 1,412,
Visits: 27,984
|
|
The way I see it, CPU's are getting very powerful, and getting cooler too. Why stick a GPU in the same device to fetch temps back up?
Surely it must lead to more power going to that area of the mobo meaning thicker / more power tracks (alongside data tracks no less), while crowding the area around the CPU with the added regulatory circuits (which can also get toasty).
5 CC wins, and proud of my messy dive!
|
|
|
|
|
Pentium
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 22:21:16
Posts: 2,175,
Visits: 5,049
|
|
I no longer see the need for a traditional CPU.
90% of all computing tasks (word processing etc) could be done with a single cell/stream processor and the other 10% would seriously benefit from 100 GPU style processors.
Why make a computer with a CPU in the first place, make a new GPU which can do CPU tasks (which is what I believe Intel are aiming for)
gaming: E4400@2.66GHz / P5K-E / 2x1GB PC8000@533MHz / 2x80GB D'Max 9-RAID0 + 320GB / 8800GTS 512MB / ViewSonic VX2835wm
server+media: P4 2.8GHz @ 2.4GHz / 775Dual-VSTA / 2x512MB PC3200 / 1000GB+500GB+250GB / HD2400pro
also: P3 for the mrs and a linux box and probably enough bits to build another one
|
|
|
|
|
Pentium
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 21:13:41
Posts: 2,890,
Visits: 5,775
|
|
AMD are in the best position then 
-------------------------------------------------------------------
www.alex3410.com <- updated take a look (29/10/08)
CPU: core2duo E4300 1.8GHz (@2.6GHz), RAM: 2GB corsair XMS2, Gcard: Geforce 7900GS 256MB, Mboard:ASROCK4CoreDual-SATA2, HDD: 1 X 500GB 2X250GB, Monitor:19" acer widescreen
|
|
|
|
|
Pentium
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 23:00:18
Posts: 5,731,
Visits: 5,683
|
|
Spedley (05/08/2008)
I no longer see the need for a traditional CPU.
90% of all computing tasks (word processing etc) could be done with a single cell/stream processor and the other 10% would seriously benefit from 100 GPU style processors.
Why make a computer with a CPU in the first place, make a new GPU which can do CPU tasks (which is what I believe Intel are aiming for)
Which would then be the CPU 
--------------------Signature. Containing even more hilarious remixes since 2008 (updated 3rd Dec)--------------------
If I'm not posting, I'm questing 
|
|
|
|
|
Pentium
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 28/11/2008 17:58:00
Posts: 1,482,
Visits: 5,653
|
|
| I'm not sure how Intel or AMD are playing this, but one obvious application is in mobile and embedded devices - a basic on-chip GPU simplifies circuit board and cooling system design considerably, making everything slightly cheaper, smaller and better looking until the next trick comes along. Pin counts aren't such a problem now that serial buses are tending to replace parallel buses (PCI-E, HyperTransport etc). It is interesting that CPU development appears to have reached a performance plateau - most people aren't short of affordable CPU power now, and even the benefits of quad-cores haven't really been proven for the majority of users, even if dual-cores are now a thing of the past. What some people are short of (and what they will therefore pay through the nose for) is GPU power, where highly parallel processing has many more real advantages. There's a lot to be said for the idea of a GPU with an on-board CPU. However, gaming GPUs are replaced annually by many gamers at the moment, and the pace of (and demand for) GPU development remains high enough that external plug-in solutions will be around for a while yet. Given all that, AMD's aquisition of ATI may not have been such a bad long-term move.
|
|
|
|
|
Santa Pig
Group: Moderators
Last Login: Today @ 16:45:35
Posts: 10,088,
Visits: 11,049
|
|
| Smaller form factors, less power and noise seem to be the boxes that need ticking these days. Seems to me that's exactely what these combo chips are aimed at.
Laptop SODIMMS are already cheaper than DIMMS and just as powerful.
2.5" drives are heading that way too. Can't see we'll need the behemoths on the desk for much longer.
Dave R
XP Pro + various VMs: Q6600 @ stock, Asus V3-P5G33, 2GB DDR2 800, 7600GT
XP Pro: E1200 @2.4Ghz, GA-G33M-DS2R/S2, 2GB DDR2 800, 3450 on HDMI
Mandriva S 2008: SOA Athlon 2200, 1GB DDR, 9550
Windows Home Server: S3000, ASUS V2-M2V890, 512mb DDR2 667, 1TB
4GB USB Pendrive: Mandriva 2009 - my portable PC 
|
|
|
|
|
Pentium
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 09:15:37
Posts: 1,799,
Visits: 4,022
|
|
Am I missing something, or did the BBC public relations release say that Intel were going to first release Larrabee as a stand-alone graphics card, competing more directly with ATI/AMD and Nvidia graphics cards ? 
I must admit that the reference to Intel having so far only supplied on-board graphics was rather confusing.
....................... Signature ......................
Still Learning and Trying to Keep It Simple in Sharing knowledge
[A] rig..ASUS-EN8500GT SATA-320+80GB G31MX-S2 2.6GHz E2160 2G
[B] rig..384M_XFX8800GS SATA-320+500GB G31MX-S2 2.9GHz E4600 2G
32-bit Mint4, Mint6rc1, WinXP & Vista Home Premium. http://tinyurl.com/MP3-Creation-with-the-Heron | | | |